A Debate Post-Mortem: McXplosions, Weird Faces and the Turkey Lurchy-Lurch

The Debate Post-Mortem: Mcplosion, Weird Faces and Lurchy-Lurch

The Third Presidential Debate: The Beauty and The Beast

In the third Presidential debate last Tuesday, John McCain was a cranky, befuddled and unpleasant embarrassment. Jeff Schweitzer concluded that, “The split screen TV killed the McCain campaign, delivering the final blow by offering the audience a clear view of the Beauty and the Beast. On one screen we saw a calm Obama, attentively listening to his opponent, then responding with coherent, concise retorts. On the other, we saw a squirming, smirking, eye-rolling, angry McCain looking uncomfortable in his own skin, stumbling through his anger to come up with a stuttering reply.”

Marty Kaplan described McCain as coming across as angrier and meaner than ever before. “Every time Obama spoke, McCain grimaced, sneered, or rolled his eyes. By contrast, every time McCain was on the attack, Obama smiled. Ninety minutes of John McCain making faces was more than enough for a lifetime. He smirked. He grimaced. He sneered. He fake-smiled. It’s hard to imagine anyone willingly inviting that antic lemon-sucking grinfest into their homes for the next four years.”

The more rage he felt, the more weird his expressions became, as he made increasingly odd faces. It’s ironic that it was McCain who more than once warned debate observers to beware of Obama’s eloquence, because if you ignored McCain’s words Tuesday night, there was nothing left to do but be mesmerized by the bizarre dance being done by his cheeks, his lips, his eyebrows and his eyes.

The Third Presidential Debate: The Beauty and the Beast

The Presidential Debate: Streamlined One-Minute Recaps

The Presidential Debate in One-Minute

Scott Bateman’s Animated One-Minute Review of The Debate

There’ll Be No Mud-Slinging in This Campaign!

Batman vs. the Penguin: There’ll Be No Mud-Slinging in This Campaign!

And Now, It’s the Weird Turkey Lurchy-Lurch!

Lurch Learns to Dance: It’s the Turkey Lurchy-Lurch!

Finally, Joe the Plumber’s Post-Debate Poll Results:

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , , , ,

Please Remember Me and Bookmark This:

The Final Presidential Debate: Obama Overwhelms McCain by Huge Margins

The Final Presidential Debate: Obama Overwhelms McCain by Huge Margins

Barack Obama Sweeps Post-Debate Polls

The New York Times gives interested readers a detailed review of last night’s third presidential debate between Senators Barack Obama and John McCain, as well as a transcript of the debate. In addition, the Times provides a video of the debate.

A new CBS News/New York Times poll showed that Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama entered the debate with a wide lead over Republican rival John McCain nationally. According to that poll, the Obama-Biden ticket now leads the McCain-Palin ticket 53 percent to 39 percent among likely voters, a 14-point margin. Just one week ago, prior to the Town Hall debate that uncommitted voters saw as a win for Obama, that margin was just three points.

Further, among independents who are likely voters, a group that has swung back and forth between McCain and Obama over the course of the campaign, the Democratic ticket now leads by 18 points. McCain led among independents last week. It appears that McCain’s campaign strategy is hurting hurt him: Twenty-one percent of voters say their opinion of the Republican has changed for the worse in the last few weeks. The top two reasons cited for the change of heart are McCain’s attacks on Obama and his choice of Sarah Palin as running mate.

A number of post-debate polls have concluded that Obama trounced McCain by wide margins in the debate. Early results in the CBS News and Knowledge Network’s national poll of uncommitted voters after last night’s debate found that fifty-three percent of the uncommitted voters surveyed identified Democratic nominee Barack Obama as the winner of tonight’s debate. Only twenty-two percent said that Republican rival John McCain won. Twenty-four percent said the debate was a draw.

The Huffington Post surveyed some other post-debate polls. A CNN poll of several hundred debate watchers favored Obama by large margins: 58 percent for Obama to McCain’s 31 percent. Perhaps more importantly, McCain’s favorable rating dropped from 51 to 49 while his unfavorable rating increased from 45 percent to 49 percent. Senator Obama ended up with a 66 percent favorable rating.

Meanwhile, virtually the entire Frank Luntz focus group on Fox News, which was held last night in Miami, said that Barack Obama had won the debate. Luntz termed it a “clear majority,” but not one person raised their hand when asked if they thought McCain had won. Said Luntz: “None had made a decision to support Sen. Obama before the debate, but more than half supported him after the debate. It was a good night for Barack Obama.”

Josh Grobin: The National Anthem (Concert for America)

The Third Presidential Debate: Obama’s Closing Statement

Who Do You Think Won the Presidential Debate?

Please Remember Me and Bookmark This:

Reflections on the McCain-Keating Affair: The False Self

John McCain and the Making of a Financial Crisis

The McCain-Keating Scandal: The Past is Prologue

In Salon, Walter Shapira points out that the driving narrative of John McCain’s political career is not having endured five and a half years in a POW camp, but rather his having suffered through four years as a center of attention in the late 1980s congressional scandal known as the Keating Five. As McCain tells it, this was a classic tale of sin and salvation as an erring senator made a grievous mistake in judgment, was hauled before the Senate Ethics Committee and, as a result, was forever changed by the public humiliation.

I would very much like to think that I have never been a man whose favor could be bought. From my earliest youth, I would have considered such a reputation to be the most shameful ignominy imaginable,” McCain wrote in his 2002 memoir. “Yet that is exactly how millions of Americans viewed me for a time, a time that I will forever consider one of the worst experiences of my life.” For those who don’t know about or remember 1988 news headlines, McCain, along with four other Democratic senators, improperly intervened with federal regulators in an effort to save the crumbling savings-and-loan empire of Charles Keating, an Arizona friend and campaign contributor of McCain’s.

The Keating Five have long lingered on the periphery of the 2008 campaign as a blast-from-the-past partisan talking point. Twenty years is a long time for penance, and most voters seemed willing to abide by a statute of limitations about scandals that date back to the era of phone booths and boom boxes.

But all that changed when the minute-by-minute chart of the Dow Jones Average began to look like a plunge off a mountain. Confronted with America’s incredible shrinking stock portfolio, both McCain and Sarah Palin reacted by openly committing their campaign to brutish and ugly attempts to tarnish Obama. The aim of those tactics clearly is to deflect the public’s attention away from the economic crisis, since McCain is increasingly viewed as extremely weak when it comes to economic issues.

The Obama campaign countered the vicious personal attacks by attempting to link the early 1990s scandal to the current economic crisis. It launched a video entitled Keating Economics, which is a searing documentary-style video of McCain’s involvement in the Keating Saving and Loan scandal. The Obama campaign, including its surrogates appearing on radio and television, will be arguing that the deregulatory fervor that caused the massive, cascading savings-and-loan collapses in the late 1980s has been pursued by McCain throughout his career, and helped to cause the current credit crisis.

Obama’s website about Keating says: “The current economic crisis demands that we understand John McCain’s attitudes about economic oversight and corporate influence in federal regulation. ….The Keating scandal is eerily similar to today’s credit crisis, where a lack of regulation and cozy relationships between the financial industry and Congress has allowed banks to make risky loans and profit by bending the rules.”

The Keating Five Scandal: McCain’s Defining Moments

When McCain was first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, he quickly positioned himself as a GOP hard-liner. He voted against honoring Martin Luther King Jr. with a national holiday in 1983, a position that he held until 1989. He backed President Reagan on tax cuts for the wealthy, abortion and support for the Nicaraguan contras. He sought to slash federal spending on social programs, and he voted twice against campaign-finance reform. He states that his “biggest” legislative victory of that era was a 1989 bill that abolished catastrophic health insurance for seniors, a move he still cheers as the first-ever repeal of a federal entitlement program.

Although he was a hawkish Cold Warrior, McCain showed an independent streak when it came to the use of American military power. Because of his experience in Vietnam, he said, he didn’t favor the deployment of U.S. forces unless there was a clear and attainable military objective. In 1983, McCain broke with Reagan and voted against the deployment of Marine peace-keepers to Lebanon. The unorthodox stance caught the attention of the media, which praised McCain’s “enormous courage.” It was the beginning of a beautiful friendship. McCain recognized early on how the game was played: The Washington press corps “tend to notice acts of political independence from unexpected quarters,” he later noted. “Now I was debating Lebanon on programs like MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour and in the pages of The New York Times and The Washington Post. I was gratified by the attention and eager for more.”

In The Rolling Stone, Tim Dickinson’s account of the Keating Five scandal, describes McCain’s early years as a senator. When McCain first became a senator in 1986, filling the seat of retiring Republican icon Barry Goldwater, he was finally in a position that a true maverick could use to battle the entrenched interests in Washington. Instead, McCain did the bidding of his major donor, Charlie Keating, whose financial empire was on the brink of collapse. Federal regulators were closing in on Keating, who had taken federally insured deposits from his Lincoln Savings and Loan and leveraged them to make wildly risky real estate ventures. If regulators restricted his investments, Keating knew that it would all be over.

In the year before his Senate run, as a U.S. representative McCain had fought for legislation that would have delayed new regulations of savings and loans. Grateful, Keating contributed $54,000 to McCain’s Senate campaign. Now, when Keating tried to stack the federal regulatory bank board with cronies, McCain made a phone call seeking to push them through. In 1987, in an unprecedented display of political intimidation, McCain also attended two meetings convened by Keating to pressure federal regulators to back off. The senators who participated in the effort would later come to be known as the Keating Five.

Senate historians were unable to find any instance in U.S. history that was comparable, in terms of five U.S. senators meeting with a regulator on behalf of one institution,” says Bill Black, who was then the deputy director of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, and who attended the second meeting. “And it hasn’t happened since.”

Subsequent to the meetings with McCain and the other senators, the regulators backed off, stalling their investigation of Lincoln. By the time the Saving and Loan collapsed two years later, taxpayers were on the hook for $3.4 billion, which stood as a record for the most expensive bank failure, until our current mortgage crisis. In addition, 20,000 investors who had bought junk bonds from Keating, thinking they were federally insured, had their savings wiped out.

McCain saw the political pressure on the regulators,” recalls Black. “He could have saved these widows from losing their life savings. But he did absolutely nothing.” McCain was ultimately given a slap on the wrist by the Senate Ethics Committee, which concluded only that he had exercised “poor judgment.”

Lessons Not Learned: The False Self

While some political pundits have disagreed with Obama’s launching of the McCain-Keating documentary as not a smart political play, as looking too much like the negative punching that is now the major strategy of team McCain. From perhaps a more perceptive approach, Walter Shapiro points out that the Obama campaign missed the real reason that the Keating Five scandal still remains relevant 20 years later.

The point lies not in the details of the bygone scandal, but rather in the way that McCain has abandoned in this presidential campaign all the good-government habits that he adopted after he was chastised by the Ethics Committee. As McCain described in his memoir, “I decided right then that not talking to reporters or sharply denying even the appearance of a problem wasn’t going to do me any good. I would henceforth accept every single request for an interview…and answer every question as completely and straightforwardly as I could.”

McCain, who until this spring was indeed one of the most accessible major politicians in America, has veered completely in the other direction, avoiding reporters at one point for more than a month. As the decision-maker on the Republican ticket, McCain is also responsible for the media strategy that has almost completely muzzled Sarah Palin since her selection as his running mate.

Far more disturbing is that it has become difficult to believe that John McCain recalls the larger message about personal honor that he supposedly learned from his Keating Five disgrace. As the campaign to tarnish Obama grows more ugly, it seems clear that McCain has made a Faustian bargain in his attempt to win the White House.

As Walter Shapiro has put it it, “If successful, McCain, of course, will have power. But if he fails, he will only have his regrets and his late-in-life reputation for low-road tactics.”

Barclay Walsh and Kitty Bennett have written more about McCain and the Keating Five in The New York Times here.

In The New Republic, there were comments about Obama’s McCain documentary written by Jason Zengerle and by Noam Scheiber.

John McCain: The Making of a Financial Crisis

Please Remember Me and Bookmark This:

Face of the Day: Sadly, Cindy McCain Lost Her “Nicey-Nice Mask”

Face of the the Day: Sadly, Cindy McCain Lost Her “Nicey-Nice Mask”

TechnoratiTechnorati: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Please Remember Me and Bookmark This:

A Critical Moment: Barack Obama Accepts the Historic Presidential Nomination

A Critical Moment: Barack Obama Accepts the Historic Presidential Nomination

An Overview of the 2008 Democratic Convention’s Concluding Session

On Thursday, the 2008 Democratic National Convention moved into Denver’s Invesco Field so that more Americans could be a part of the fourth and final night of the Convention, where Barack Obama accepted the historic Democratic nomination for President. A crowd of almost 85,000 people attended the convention’s assembly at Invesco to hear Senator Obama’s acceptance speech.

Oscar-winning singer and Broadway actress Jennifer Hudson sang the National Anthem, and there were a number of other live live musical performances, including appearances by will.i.am (accompanied by John Legend, Agape choir, and band), the singer Sheryl Crowe and the legendary Stevie Wonder.

Before Senator Obama’s acceptance speech, Former Vice-President Al Gore spoke in support of Obama. Gore expressed heated criticisms about a number of public policy positions held by both Senator McCain and President Bush. His criticisms pointed to a number of specific issues in areas that included the environment, the economy and foreign affairs. Following Al Gore’s remarks, a biographic video of Obama was shown, which was directed by Davis Guggenheim, the Oscar-winning Director of An Inconvenient Truth.

Dave Stewart’s All-Star Music Video: My American Prayer

Replay: A Live Blogging of the Entire Acceptance Speech Event

A Biographic Tribute Video: The Search for Self

All Across the Nation, Something is Stirring

Barack Obama addressed a crowd of almost 85,000 supporters at the concluding session of the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver Thursday evening, accepting the historic Democratic nomination for President of the United States. By Friday morning, a true avalanche of reviews had appeared, articles by so-called political-pundits representing both the mainstream media and new media bloggers. Many of the reviewers were enthralled by Senator Obama’s speech, but others were left with mixed feelings. Of the latter, some felt that his address failed to display the soaring, inspirational oratory that was characteristic of Obama’s earlier speeches, while others naively complained that his speech was just a repeat of his high-minded oratory that lacked any substance or specifics.

The pundits who were critical tended to churn out reviews that reflected a tenuous ability to grasp deeper or complex meanings, reviews that were highly superficial. These political-pundits are often the media’s more well-known public voices, but voices whose body of writings generally reflects a narcissistic conviction of entitlement. In fact, the dangerously alarming truth of the matter is that they view political events that are crucial to all Americans as their own personal sparkling merry-go-round, where their last political love affair is simply an entrée to their next encounter.

In sharply defined contrast, Barack Obama is a deeply thoughtful man, a characteristic once again revealed in his talk with supporters in the Invesco stadium on Thursday evening, many of whom during various parts of his address listened quietly in personal contemplative concentration. Not only was Obama addressing in detail the specifics of his positions during the acceptance speech, but far beyond that he was teaching and thus sharing with his supporters an understanding of the logic of his positions, as well as the logic supporting his reasons for repudiating Senator McCain’s political beliefs. In this context, Senator Obama clarified for all of America the fundamental motivation underlying the choice to embark upon his improbable and difficult run for the presidency: that neither Senator McCain, nor President Bush, nor the Republican administration will own up to their failures and to the devastating, often tragic results of those failures.

Error
This video doesn’t exist

With Profound Gratitude and Great Humility, I Accept

Music Audio: The O’Jays/Love Train

Barack Obama Wins Historic Presidential Nomination

Please Remember Me and Bookmark This:

%d bloggers like this: